Why we Nepalese think that these Maoists, Parties and Monarchy is an internal issue.  It is a matter of complex foreign affairs and defense.  Common people have no understanding what is going on, and India is succeeding in destabilizing Nepal.   When the Kings of Sikkim, Nepal, Kashmir (Hyderabad and Gwalior) were offered to surrender the defense, and foreign affairs to India, everyone agreed and became the Union of India, except Nepal.  King Mahendra denied, and since then, Monarchy became a problem for India.  To eradicate Monarchy, India started ruling through its proxy citizens—the Indian Bihari Prime Minister Girija Prasad being a common example in present days.   The Maoists lived in India, parties lived in India, were supported by India, and launched war against king.  If you read Sikkim’s history, India had successfully executed a plan like this.  I am afraid, Nepal can become another Sikkim.  Learn to understand the foreign affairs here, know India’s reality, and form ways to attack upon India.  Let Indians know what Nepal is.  Dare not Indians presume that we are Sikkimese.  Form a coalition of Nepal, Kashmir, Sikkim, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Tibet and other small countries who don’t like India, and invade it.  That will be the day when true Gurkha blood will show its color. 

dude get some history lessons first..........it was tribhuvan who tried to offer nepal to jwarharlal nehru on a condition tht he would be made a president which nehru had refused. then he even offered our country to Nehru for Rs 30,000,000.

http://www.kantipuronline.com/kolnews.php?&nid=131894

shah dynasty is a burden to nepal....they have always robbed nepal...

regarding sikkim it was their own fault of not tryin to defend........nepal should at least learn frm tht........

The difference is: you have read the Indian version of story--the same story which claims Lumbini in Nepal--and I know the real scenario.
No further arguments entertained.  You failed to rebut my presumption.

how could u associate these two different things and how can u prove tht it was the indian version????

did u go through the article...............it was written by a nepali write in a nepali publication called KANTIPUR for your kind information..........

I understand that there is a threat from India. But, the amount of threat is always there irrespective of the king's existence or not. We can be an unified nation even in absence of King. So, existence of king has nothing to do with nepal's independence. We can save our independence if we be unified and fight with any external threat.